"Should of" is always wrong.
If you write "should of," "would of," or "could of" even once, your credibility will take a dive. If you do it more than once, you're toast.
Click to hear the difference between "should of" and "should've":
"should of, should've"
More about Should Of, Would Of, and Could Of
"Should of," "would of," and "could of" are incorrect expansions of the contractions "should've," "would've," and "could've." This error occurs because "should've" sounds a bit like "should of," etc. Of course, the correct expansions are "should have," "would have," and "could have."Examples of Should've, Would've, and Could've
Here are some examples with "should have" used correctly:- I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury. (Comedian Groucho Marx) (The original had "should've.")
- I have offended God and mankind because my work didn't reach the quality it should have. (Polymath Leonardo da Vinci) (The original translation had "should have.")
- Had I become a priest, the sermons would of been electric!
- I loved what I did. I could of been secretary of state forever.
Is Should Of Always Wrong?
It is possible to write a correct sentence with "should of," but this is never an expansion of "should've." For example:- Should of be capitalized in a title? (If you've found this page by asking this question, the answer is no under the title case style.)
Key Point
- Never expand "'ve" to "of." It's a serious grammar mistake that will undermine your credibility.
- Should of
- Would of
- Could of
You might also like...
Help us improve...
Was something wrong with this page?
Use #gm to find us quicker.
Create a QR code for this, or any, page.
teachers' zone
play:
match the pairs (parts of speech) hundreds more games and testsread:
parts-of-speech listsconfirmatory test
This test is printable and sendable