Is Volvo's 'less emissions, not less style' grammatically acceptable?

Free grammar tips, lessons and tests

Recommended purchases

This site: Grammar Monster on line Daily tips with Grammar Monster's gadget Daily tips with Grammar Monster on Twitter  The best grammar reference books Grammar Monster off line The only grammar checker we'll endorse
Common grammar errors
Easily confused words
Grammar terms & definitions
Grammar tests
Grammar lessons
Search this site


 Home

Search
 

Glossary
of Terms

Common
Errors

FAQs

Grammar
Chat

Download

Grammar
Checker


Is Volvo's "Less emissions, not less style" grammatically acceptable?


Volvo's logo


Volvo's slogan

 

The Charge:

The word "less" should be replaced with "fewer". Less is used for a single item (e.g. less smoke); whereas, "fewer" is used when there is more than one item (e.g. fewer emissions).
 

Case for the Defence / Defense :

Nearly everyone says "less" before a plural noun these days. The grammar ruling above is outdated.  Moreover, the effectiveness of this advertisement relies on repeating the word "less". 
 

Case for Prosecution:

Rules are rules, I'm afraid. You may have noticed that lots of people say "you was" instead of "you were". Does that mean it is grammatically acceptable? Imagine an insurance company's advert that read: "I was insured.  You was insured."  Could they claim that is grammatically acceptable because the effectiveness of the advert relies on repeating the word "was"?  I think not.
 

Judge Grammar Monster's Decision:

Mmm, this is a difficult one. I have already judged that Starbucks and Asda are guilty of committing grammatical errors by using less instead of fewer.  However, I am not bound by precedence, and I believe that Volvo has a strong case for using less. I do not think the "you was" example is a fair comparison because "less + [plural noun]" is much more widespread.  I also think that the effectiveness of this advert relies heavily on repeating the word "less".  One shouldn't be too proscriptive with advertisements.  They are designed to catch a reader's imagination - not showcase the writer's intellectual prowess. I judge Volvo's slogan to be acceptable.    

 
See more companies subjected to Grammar Court.
You can discuss this judgment on this grammar chat forum.
You can submit a charge against a company using the contact us form (send any photos later). 

Related case:

Starbucks "less napkins"
Asda's "less bags"
   

Grammar Monster © | Copyright Registration Number: 226604 | All rights reserved