Follow us on Twitter Use our gadget on iGoogle Follow us on Facebook Chat about grammar Search this site
Grammar Lessons | Grammar Tests | Common Grammar Errors | Grammatical Terms | Easily Confused Words | Free Grammar Checker | Search | Contact Us

Is Starbucks 'less napkins' grammatically acceptable?



Is Starbucks 'less napkins' grammatically acceptable?


Starbucks logo


scan of a Starbucks napkin

 

The Charge:

The word "less" should be replaced with "fewer". Less is used for a single item (e.g. less time); whereas, "fewer" is used when there is more than one item (e.g. fewer mice).
 

Defence
Defense Case:

What's the opposite of "more"? I surveyed 100 people, and they all said "less". The effect of this slogan depends on that fact.  You can bet your life savings that 'fewer napkins' was considered by the chaps at Starbucks, but its inclusion makes for a less memorable slogan and a far less effective message.
 

Prosecution Case:

I know there is some leniency in advertising, but this ruling is not up for debate.  I can live with your three phrases ending in full stops / periods despite their not being sentences. However, the "less napkins" error is the equivalent of writing "a cars" or "one trees". There has to be agreement between noun and its modifier when such a solid rule exists.

A large reputable company like Starbucks must play its role in educating our children. It has an obligation to its customers beyond coffee and muffins. 
 

Judge Grammar Monster's Decision:

I accept that "less" and "more" work well together, contributing to the effectiveness of this slogan. However, I think that more people would take the campaign seriously if "fewer" were used.  This grammar ruling is under attack from many quarters, and widespread abuse of it in print by Starbucks will do little to promote "less + plural noun" as incorrect.

I judge that the slogan on the Starbucks napkin is grammatically unacceptable.  Please point it out to them next time you're in the vicinity.          
 
  See more companies subjected to Grammar Court.
You can discuss this judgment on this grammar chat forum.
You can submit a charge against a company using the contact us form (send any photos later). 


We need your help to improve Grammar Monster.

Do you disagree with something on this site?
Do you have any entertaining examples that would improve this site?
Do you have any pictures that would make our site more entertaining?

  Please tell us
  using this form.

Do you have a grammar question?

  You can ask us
  on our grammar forum.

Share Grammar Monster with others.

Delicious Digg Facebook reddit Stumble
Grammar Lessons | Grammar Tests | Common Grammar Errors | Grammatical Terms | Easily Confused Words | Free Grammar Checker | Search | Contact Us